Thanks!!!

I just wanted to say thank you to everyone who came out and contributed to the opening of the Locality show, and made it such a success!!! Seriously, the level of work and the number of people that came out to support was better than any of us could have hoped for.  I am hoping to have pictures from the opening up soon. And if you missed out on the opening, or want more of the greatness, come to the closing party, on April 16th, 8pm - 11pm.

Thanks again!!!

Back in the Saddle

naomi(HDR-GIF)

So, I really haven't been posting much lately, but I have been really under the gun with the end of classes last week, this trip to Europe that coming up in a few weeks, work, and a few other assorted long term projects.

On the more immediate front, I have also been working on some new work for a show that will be going up at the end of June.  (I will post the details when I get them, but the theme of the show is "Best Friends")  But the show goes up a few days after I get back from Europe, so I have been trying to get the work done before I go.  I have been working with a new process, by combining low resolution GIFs into an HDR image.  You can see one of the results up top.  There are some problems that I am running into, but hopefully they will be solved by the time the show goes up.

Europe and Fairs

So barrring some unforseen event, I am going to be going to Europe this June for some of the art fairs. I will be going to the Venice Biennale, Art Basel, Documenta, and skulptur projekte muenster. I will be going with my dean, Okwui Enwezor, who curated Documenta 11, and so we will be meeting with a lot of the artists and curators as we go to these different places. I am very excited about this, and it looks like it's going be a lot of fun.

the blood brothers

IMG_1836
IMG_1919

The Blood Brothers, who are old, good friends of mine, were in town tonight, so I got to see them.  Which was a nice excuse to take a break for doing schoolwork.  I don't get to see them that often, as they still live in Seattle, and I haven't for about six years or so, but I get to see them a few times a year when they come through on tour.

Magritte and Fair Use

Boing Boing posted an article today about the "Magritte and Contemporary Art: The Treachery of Images" exhibit at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (which I went to last weekend) about, in Cory

If the point of the exhibit is to show us the wonders of fair use, how can LACMA justify taking paintings in on terms that betray fair use?

Now, I have been to the exhibit in question, as well as many other exhibits that banned photography, and I have never seen it as conflicting with fair use.  Although it is not the case with the Magritte exhibit, a lot of museums when showing older work, do not allow photographs, or at least flash photography, not only because it annoys the other patrons, but because the light from the flashes can artificially age and degrade the work. (Some museums won't even let you take in pens; they will only let you take in pencils for fear of you making permanent marks to the work.) But more to the point of the article, big shows of famous artists are great opportunities for bootleggers to come and make nice copies of the work, and it becomes the collector's prerogative whether they want to allow photography or not.  It has less to do with fair use, and more with protecting the integrity of the work.  Artists make their living off of their work.  If people come in and take pictures of the work, and make copies of the work, thats money out of their pocket.  (And this does happen.  A lot.  Just check out You Thought We Wouldn't Notice)  So if they don't want photography, then that is a decision that we should respect.  Personally, I don't like the idea of people saying that work is either totally copyrighted or totally fair use; I think that it should be up to the individual artist to decide for themselves what they want for their work.  Thats why I like, and use, Creative Commons licenses: because they allow you to choose how much access to your work you want to allow, instead of the all-or-nothing approach. And moreover, a showing is not the place to be making a copy that you want to work with.  If you want to use another artist's image in your own work, and you need to work with the original, contact the artist, or in lieu of that the gallery or collector that has their work.  Requests like that are not uncommon at the gallery that I am at, and a lot of the time the artists, if approached by someone serious, are happy to work with them.  There are just safeguards that they have to put up in order to protect themselves and their livelihood.

In the end, I really don't see how the inclusion or exclusion of photography in an exhibit is a good bellwether of a work's fair use rights.  There are so many other avenues that one can pursue in order to procure a particular image that it all seems like a rather moot point.  I can see where someone from the outside, who's only exposure to art is in the museum setting, would be confused, (as condescending as that sounds) but the fine arts were able to thrive and have a free flow of ideas for hundreds of years without the aid of photography in exhibits, and I am confident that it can continue to do so.  Because for artists, it is not the photographic documentation, but the idea that is paramount.  And as long as those are not locked away, we can continue to dialog with each other, just as the Magritte exhibit presents.

James Drake at Paule Anglim

Gallery Paule Anglim has a show up right now of James Drake's work that is worth a look. This is one of the cases where seeing the images online doesn't do them justice, as they are quite large. Of particular interest are four drawing, all ten feet high, of war time portraits. If you are in the area, it is worth a visit. The show will be up until January 27

(Full Disclosure: I currently intern at Gallery Paule Anglim)